33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police would be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, guarantee regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
How much sway case regulation holds might fluctuate by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances from the current case. To take a look at this concept, think about the following case legislation definition.
As the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it correct to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been achieved, therefore the decision read more in the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load presented to any reported judgment may perhaps depend on the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons having their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It really is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Performing a case law search could be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, like:
Statutory laws are These created by legislative bodies, for example Congress at both the federal and state levels. Though this kind of legislation strives to form our society, furnishing rules and guidelines, it would be not possible for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
Usually, only an appeal accepted via the court of very last resort will resolve these differences and, For most reasons, such appeals in many cases are not granted.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are set up by executive businesses based on statutes.